Re: [PATCH 05/28] cpufreq: drop owner assignment from platform_drivers

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:39:32PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

On Monday, December 22, 2014 07:14:56 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:

quoted

On 22 December 2014 at 02:44, Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the
driver core.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <redacted>
---
Generated with coccinelle. SmPL file is in the introductory msg. The big
cleanup was pulled in this merge window. This series catches the bits fallen
through. The patches shall go in via the subsystem trees.

 drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c
index 25fbd6a1374f..f0913eee2f50 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ls1x-cpufreq.c

@@ -210,7 +210,6 @@ out:
 static struct platform_driver ls1x_cpufreq_platdrv = {
        .driver = {
                .name   = "ls1x-cpufreq",
-               .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
        },
        .probe          = ls1x_cpufreq_probe,
        .remove         = ls1x_cpufreq_remove,

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--

OK

Wolfram, please feel free to push this through whatever tree you think is
appropriate.

I'd prefer if you take it. However, I'll send all leftover ones to Greg,
so you can decide.