Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 6 authors, 2014-10-19

Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] cpufreq-dt, platform_data based proposal

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2014-09-10 12:38:09
Also in: linux-arm-msm

On 10 September 2014 17:38, Thomas Petazzoni
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hello,

Here is the v2 of the platform_data based proposal to make cpufreq-dt
understand when it has a shared clock by all CPUs vs. independent
clock for each CPU.

Changes since v1:

 - Use a 'void *driver_data' in cpufreq_driver instead of extending
   the existing flags field. Suggested by Viresh.

 - Keep the regulator related warning in cpufreq-dt, but reword it,
   and move it to the dev_dbg() level instead of dev_warn().

Thanks,

Thomas

Thomas Petazzoni (4):
  cpufreq: allow driver-specific data
  cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: extend with platform_data
  ARM: mvebu: use the cpufreq-dt platform_data for independent clocks
  cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: adjust message related to regulators
After Arnd's reply:

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help