Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] cpufreq: Add module to register cpufreq on Krait CPUs
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-09 00:37:46
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml
On 09/07/14 21:46, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 6 September 2014 04:17, Stephen Boyd [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + */ + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/cpu.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h> +#include <linux/init.h>Would be good if these can be in alphanumeric order. That helps maintaining them later on..
Ok.
quoted
+static int __init qcom_cpufreq_populate_opps(void) +{ + int len, num_rows, i, k; + char table_name[] = "qcom,speedXX-pvsXX-bin-vXX"; + struct device_node *np; + struct device *dev; + int cpu = 0; + int speed, pvs, pvs_ver; + int cols;All the 'int' declarations can be combined in a single line if you would like.
Sure.
quoted
+ +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm CPUfreq driver");A module author as well?
How about we use git blame instead? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation