Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] power: Add simple gpio-restart driver
From: David Riley <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-27 17:56:24
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Sebastian, Thanks for the feedback. On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Sebastian Reichel [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi David, On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 04:45:05PM -0700, David Riley wrote:quoted
This driver registers a restart handler to set a GPIO line high/low to reset a board based on devicetree bindings.Driver looks fine to me. I have some comments about the Documentation, though:quoted
[...]diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-restart.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-restart.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7cd58788 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-restart.txt@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +Driver a GPIO line that can be used to restart the system as a +restart handler.Please fix the Typo (first word).
Fixed.
quoted
[...] + +The driver supports both level triggered and edge triggered power off. +At driver load time, the driver will request the given gpio line and +install a restart handler.The wording is too driver centric IMHO. You are supposed to document the binding in a generic way. Maybe start with something like: "This binding supports level and edge triggered reset." (power off is the wrong word, since there is already gpio-poweroff).
I've cleaned this up for v2.
quoted
+If the optional properties 'input' is +not found, the GPIO line +will be driven in the inactive state. Otherwise its configured +as an input.What is this needed for?
This allows other hardware to be attached to the same line to reset the system. Carried forward from the gpio-poweroff implementation I based this on.
quoted
+When do_kernel_restart is called the various restart handlers will be tried +in order. The gpio is configured as an output, and drive active, so +triggering a level triggered power off condition. This will also cause an +inactive->active edge condition, so triggering positive edge triggered +power off. After a delay of 100ms, the GPIO is set to inactive, thus +causing an active->inactive edge, triggering negative edge triggered power +off. After another 100ms delay the GPIO is driver active again. If the +power is still on and the CPU still running after a 3000ms delay, a +WARN_ON(1) is emitted.I really appreciate the description of the driver (it made it easier to review it :)), but Documentation/devicetree should avoid Linuxisms. In other words: this is the wrong location for the description.
I've cleaned this up as well and made the explicit delays configurable.
quoted
+Required properties: +- compatible : should be "gpio-restart". +- gpios : The GPIO to set high/low, see "gpios property" in + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt. If the pin should be + low to power down the board set it to "Active Low", otherwise set + gpio to "Active High". + +Optional properties: +- input : Initially configure the GPIO line as an input. Only reconfigure + it to an output when the machine_restart function is called. If this optional + property is not specified, the GPIO is initialized as an output in its + inactive state. +- priority : A priority ranging from 0 to 255 (default 128) according to + the following guidelines: + 0: Restart handler of last resort, with limited restart + capabilities + 128: Default restart handler; use if no other restart handler is + expected to be available, and/or if restart functionality is + sufficient to restart the entire system + 255: Highest priority restart handler, will preempt all other + restart handlersYou should add a short information about the property type here (e.g. "8 bit integer" for priority).
As per Olof's comments I've just changed this to be a regular cell for consistency with other bindings and will handle the range checking internally.
quoted
+Examples: + +gpio-restart { + compatible = "gpio-restart"; + gpios = <&gpio 4 0>; + priority = /bits/ 8 <200>; +}; [...]-- Sebastian