Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2013-07-30

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Remove extra variables

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2013-07-30 13:49:11
Also in: lkml

On 30 July 2013 19:28, Rafael J. Wysocki [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 07:06:33 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
quoted
We call cpufreq_cpu_get() in cpufreq_add_dev_symlink() to increase usage
refcount of policy and not to get policy for a cpu. So, we don't really need to
capture the return value of this routine and call put for it later for failure
cases. We can simply use policy passed as an argument to this routine.

Moreover debug print is rewritten to make it more clear.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Both [1-2/2] look good, but what do they apply to?  Mainline, linux-next,
my bleeding-edge branch?
Sorry for not mentioning this, bleeding-edge :)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help