On 25-07-2013 12:38, Pawel Moll wrote:

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:15 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:

quoted

quoted

Another way, as I mentioned in the original RFC, an option would be to
have the thermal_zone node not embedded in any device node. But them, we
would need to firmly link it to other device nodes, to describe what is
monitored and what is used for monitoring. 

You mean the zone nodes would live at the top level of the tree? To my
mind the root represents the device (the board, whatever you call it),

What I wanted to say was: ... so the zone would still be embedded in a
device node :-)

ahh ok.. I see.

Pawel

-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin