Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2013-01-18

Re: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: Warn user when powernow-k8 tries to fall back to acpi-cpufreq and it is unavailable.

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date: 2013-01-18 19:37:07
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:06:59PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:00:21PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
quoted
##################################################################################
# x86 drivers.
# Link order matters. K8 is preferred to ACPI because of firmware bugs in early
# K8 systems.
...

Great. :(
The only case I can see this hitting would be if the platform is using 
system IO rather than fixed hardware functionality. Easiest thing to do 
there would be something like this:
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 0d048f6..8b466d5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -762,6 +762,11 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	switch (perf->control_register.space_id) {
 	case ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO:
+		if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) {
+			pr_debug("Old AMD systems must use native drivers\n");
+			result = -ENODEV;
+			goto err_unreg;
+		}
 		pr_debug("SYSTEM IO addr space\n");
 		data->cpu_feature = SYSTEM_IO_CAPABLE;
 		break;
Ok, how much can we rely on ACPI to have this ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO
properly set on K8? Because the thing is, we want to use acpi-cpufreq on
F10h onwards and leave powernow-k8 to K8s.

So we're purely relying on ->control_register.space_id being
ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO on *all* K8s. And with the history BIOS has, I
don't trust it a single bit. Other than that, this could work...

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help