I thought I had addressed all the issues with the v9 version. The only comments I got on it was Mike's reviewed-by and I didn't think that warranted a resend.

If you do want me to send it again, do you want it  updated to current top-of-tree? That may take a bit, since there's an unrelated bug that's preventing my test box from booting.

--Mark Langsdorf
Calxeda, Inc.


________________________________________
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [rjw@sisk.pl]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 7:12 AM
To: Mark Langsdorf
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; cpufreq@vger.kernel.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v8] cpufreq: add support for Calxeda ECX-1000 (highbank)

On Wednesday, December 05, 2012 10:48:35 AM Mark Langsdorf wrote:

This patch series adds cpufreq support for the Calxeda
ECX-1000 (highbank) SoCs. The EnergyCore Management Engine (ECME) on
the ECX-1000 manages the voltage for the part and communications with
Linux through a pl320 mailbox. clk notifications are used to control
when to send messages to the ECME.

If you want me to handle this, can you please resend the whole patchset (with
all of the comments addressed, if possible)?

Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.