Re: [regression] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver livelocks idle system
From: Daniel Lezcano <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-20 18:16:57
Also in:
lkml
On 12/18/2012 12:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, December 17, 2012 10:59:09 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:quoted
On 12/17/2012 08:36 PM, Russ Anderson wrote:quoted
The 3.7 kernel grinds to a halt on boot of a system with 2048 cpus. NMI showed most of the cpus in _raw_spin_lock in cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(). (backtrace below) A quick look at cpuidle_get_cpu_driver() shows the hot lock. In drivers/cpuidle/driver.c: -------------------------------------------------------- /** * cpuidle_get_cpu_driver - return the driver tied with a cpu */ struct cpuidle_driver *cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(struct cpuidle_device *dev) { struct cpuidle_driver *drv; if (!dev) return NULL; spin_lock(&cpuidle_driver_lock); drv = __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev->cpu); spin_unlock(&cpuidle_driver_lock); return drv; } --------------------------------------------------------Hi Russ, thanks for investigating the problem. You are right, there is a bottleneck here. Regarding how is used the cpuidle code, I think it is safe to remove the locks.OK, a patch would be appreciated. :-) If you prepare one, please explain in the changelog why it is safe to drop the locks.
Ok, sure. I have some troubles with my x86 hardware, so it could take a couple of days before I can send a fix a bit tested.
quoted
quoted
This change was added in on Nov 14th, 2012. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=bf4d1b5ddb78f86078ac6ae0415802d5f0c68f92 The patch says it adds support for cpus with different characteristics, but adds a big global lock. The comment claims "no impact for the other platforms if the option is disabled", which leads me to believe the spin_lock was added inadvertently. CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS is off in my config file. linux$ grep CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS .config # CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS is not set As more cpus become idle, more cpus fight over the lock until the system livelocks on the crushing weight of idle. The fix may be to move the spin_lock into __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver, which has different versions for CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS, to avoid impacting the disabled case, or get rid of the spin_lock all together. -------------------------------------------------------- == UV NMI process trace cpu 12: == CPU 12 Pid: 0, comm: swapper/12 Tainted: G O 3.7.0.rja-sgi+ #38 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81614e45>] [<ffffffff81614e45>] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffff814c891c>] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff814c871d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x7d/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8101d08d>] cpu_idle+0xdd/0x130 [<ffffffff8160a3ea>] start_secondary+0xc6/0xcc --------------------------------------------------------
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog