Re: [PATCH] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the feature
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-17 19:27:33
Also in:
lkml
On Mon 2012-02-13 16:41:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012, Jean Pihet wrote:quoted
The PM QoS feature depends on CONFIG_PM which depends on PM_SLEEP || PM_RUNTIME. This breaks CPU C-states with kernels not having these CONFIGs. This patch allows the feature in all cases. Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <redacted> Reported-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <redacted> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <redacted> Cc: Mark Gross <redacted>Applied, but I modified the changelog (please have a look at the linux-pm/pm-qos branch for details).
Is it good idea? For servers, power management / QoS is not neccessary... What about fixing kconfig, instead? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html