Hello,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:42:53AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
quoted
Okay, narrowed exit path protection down to setting of PF_EXITING
itself. ->exit() on dangling tasks is a bit weird but I don't think
it's too bad. Frederic, are you okay with this version?
Yeah that new scheme that only protects PF_EXITING may look a bit
strange. But I think we are fine. With rcu list traversal, it should
be safe even if a group member is concurrently dropped from the list (in that
case all we check if its PF_EXITING then we give up). And we may
have a concurrent ->exit() but that should be fine too.
Thanks!
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <redacted>
Awesome, adding Acked-by, putting it on top of pm-freezer and pushing
it out to linux-next.
Thank you.
--
tejun