Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2011-08-23

Re: [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-23 21:31:54

On Tuesday, August 23, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:05:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
quoted
On Sunday, August 21, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
quoted
I don't understand why the driver would need to know what situation it's
in.  I'd been working on the basis that the idea was that the driver
said what the constraints it has are and then some code with a more
system wide view would make the actual decisions for things outside the
driver domian.
quoted
That's correct, but in order to figure out a "sensible default"
the driver generally would need to know what the expectations with
respect to it are.  Otherwise it can very well generate a random
number and use that.
Right, but I'd expect that should be something that the driver can
generally do based on knowledge of what it needs to deliver to its
users.  It doesn't need to be tunable to that - for example, input
devices will have a reasonable idea of the response time needed to
deliver interactive performance.  If it's really got no idea then
hopefully not providng any constraints will do something sensible.
Perhaps.  Still, that requires some policy to be put into drivers,
which I don't think is entirely correct.

Thanks,
Rafael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help