Re: [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-23 21:31:54
On Tuesday, August 23, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:05:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:quoted
On Sunday, August 21, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:quoted
quoted
I don't understand why the driver would need to know what situation it's in. I'd been working on the basis that the idea was that the driver said what the constraints it has are and then some code with a more system wide view would make the actual decisions for things outside the driver domian.quoted
That's correct, but in order to figure out a "sensible default" the driver generally would need to know what the expectations with respect to it are. Otherwise it can very well generate a random number and use that.Right, but I'd expect that should be something that the driver can generally do based on knowledge of what it needs to deliver to its users. It doesn't need to be tunable to that - for example, input devices will have a reasonable idea of the response time needed to deliver interactive performance. If it's really got no idea then hopefully not providng any constraints will do something sensible.
Perhaps. Still, that requires some policy to be put into drivers, which I don't think is entirely correct. Thanks, Rafael