Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:17:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

quoted

Actually, the reverse - there's no terribly good way to make PCs work 
with scheduler-based suspend, but there's no reason why they wouldn't 
work with the current opportunistic suspend implementation.

If one works so does the other.

Not at all. The entire point of opportunistic suspend is that I don't 
care is currently in TASK_RUNNABLE or has a timer that's due to expire 
in 100msec - based on policy (through not having any held suspend 
blockers), I'll go to sleep. That's easily possible on PCs.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org