Re: sleepy linux self-test

On Saturday 02 February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:

quoted

quoted

Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix.

Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the 
"right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that 
"rtc0" is the right RTC to use.  :)

because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it 
makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume.

I think you should have written "quick and dirty".  ;)

It would have been easier to just use the public interface
and hard-wire "rtc0".  But going directly to the hardware
was dirtier, and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously
shouldn't go upstream until it gets done properly".

- Dave