Re: Re: [PATCH] PM: Acquire device locks on suspend

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

quoted

I don't see anything wrong with it.  All that will happen is that the
removal will start before the suspend and finish after the resume.

In that case, we'll attempt to call the device's .suspend() and .resume()
routines, but we shouldn't do that, IMHO.

I don't see anything wrong with that since the driver must be prepared to
handle that even in the regular case, it's the only thing you can
guarantee: no more method calls after removal finishes. Am I totally
misunderstanding things?

johannes