Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Hibernation: Arbitrary boot kernel support on x86_64
From: <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-25 18:41:50
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2007-08-27 · Re: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Hibernation: Arbitrary boot kernel support on x86_64 · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
- 2007-08-25 · Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Hibernation: Arbitrary boot kernel support on x86_64 · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
- 2007-08-24 · Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Hibernation: Arbitrary boot kernel support on x86_64 · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
- 2007-08-24 · Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Hibernation: Arbitrary boot kernel support on x86_64 · Pavel Machek <hidden>
- 2007-08-24 · Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] Hibernation: Arbitrary boot kernel support on x86_64 · Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 24 August 2007 22:46, Pavel Machek wrote:quoted
Hi!quoted
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <redacted> Make it possible to restore a hibernation image on x86_64 with the help of a kernel different from the one in the image. The idea is to split the core restoration code into two separate parts and to place each of them in a different page. The first part belongs to the bootWhat happens in case where both parts want to be at the same place? (Like kernel being restored is 4KB smaller, so that routines now collide?)Bad things, but I can't see how to avoid that reliably.
can you at least detect it reliably? (feed a program both kernel images and have it tell you 'yes/no') David Lang