Re: [PATCH, RFC] [1/3] Generic in-kernel AC status
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2006-02-10 12:21:22
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2006-02-10 12:21:22
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On St 08-02-06 23:25:32, Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote:
Hi! On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:04:22PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h...quoted
+void pm_set_ac_status(int (*ac_status_function)(void)) +{ + down(&pm_sem); + get_ac_status = ac_status_function; + up(&pm_sem); +}Why do you need a semaphore/mutex, when you only do one assignment, which is atomic by itself?
It is not. Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...