Re: [linux-pm] [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: 2006-01-05 22:13:37
Also in:
lkml
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: 2006-01-05 22:13:37
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:55:29PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
quoted
I have a firewire controller in a desktop system, and a ATI Radeon in a T42 that support D1 and D2..Ok, now we have a concrete example. So Radeon supports D1. But putting radeon into D1 means you probably want to blank your screen and turn the backlight off; that takes *long* time anyway. So you can simply put your radeon into D3 and save a bit more power.
Using your logic, you never want to put your CPU into C2 power-saving state instead of C3 or C4. Which is ridiculous. There are technical reasons why you want to put devices into different power-saving states. E.g. wakeup latency, ability to receive wakeup signals, snooping and so on. In addition, your patch breaks pcmcia / pcmciautils which already uses numbers (which I already had to change from "3" to "2" before...). Dominik