Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 6 authors, 2005-08-08

Re: [PATCH] Workqueue freezer support.

From: Nigel Cunningham <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-08 01:38:07
Also in: lkml

Hi.

On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 11:27, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:46 am, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
quoted
Hi.

Sorry for the slow response. Busy still.

On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 15:06, Patrick Mochel wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
quoted
Hi.

I finally found some time to finish this off. I don't really like the
end result - the macros looked clearer to me - but here goes. If it
looks okay, I'll seek sign offs from each of the affected driver
maintainers and from Ingo. Anyone else?
What are your feelings about this: http://lwn.net/Articles/145417/ ?
I'm sure it could work, but I do worry a little about the possibilities
for exploits. It seems to me that if someone can get root, they an
insmod a module that could schedule any kind of work via any process.
Tracing that sort of security hole could be intractable. Christoph, is
that something you've considered/have thoughts on? Perhaps I'm just
being paranoid :>
If someone gets root access it means you're already exploited.
Yeah, true. Ok. Lame thought :>

Nigel
Cheers,
Con
-- 
Evolution.
Enumerate the requirements.
Consider the interdependencies.
Calculate the probabilities.

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help