Re: [PATCH] Workqueue freezer support.
From: Nigel Cunningham <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-08 01:38:07
Also in:
lkml
From: Nigel Cunningham <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-08 01:38:07
Also in:
lkml
Hi. On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 11:27, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:46 am, Nigel Cunningham wrote:quoted
Hi. Sorry for the slow response. Busy still. On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 15:06, Patrick Mochel wrote:quoted
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Nigel Cunningham wrote:quoted
Hi. I finally found some time to finish this off. I don't really like the end result - the macros looked clearer to me - but here goes. If it looks okay, I'll seek sign offs from each of the affected driver maintainers and from Ingo. Anyone else?What are your feelings about this: http://lwn.net/Articles/145417/ ?I'm sure it could work, but I do worry a little about the possibilities for exploits. It seems to me that if someone can get root, they an insmod a module that could schedule any kind of work via any process. Tracing that sort of security hole could be intractable. Christoph, is that something you've considered/have thoughts on? Perhaps I'm just being paranoid :>If someone gets root access it means you're already exploited.
Yeah, true. Ok. Lame thought :> Nigel
Cheers, Con
-- Evolution. Enumerate the requirements. Consider the interdependencies. Calculate the probabilities.