On 16-06-22, 08:35, Doug Anderson wrote:

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 2:07 PM Douglas Anderson [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

We're supposed to list the supplies in the dt bindings but there are
none in the eDP PHY bindings.

Looking at the driver in Linux, I can see that there seem to be two
relevant supplies: "vdda-phy" and "vdda-pll". Let's add those to the
bindings.

NOTE: from looking at the Qualcomm datasheet for sc7280, it's not
immediately clear how to figure out how to fill in these supplies. The
only two eDP related supplies are simply described as "power for eDP
0.9V circuits" and "power for eDP 1.2V circuits". From guessing and
from comparing how a similar PHY is hooked up on other similar
Qualcomm boards, I'll make the educated guess that the 1.2V supply
goes to "vdda-phy" and the 0.9V supply goes to "vdda-pll" and I'll use
that in the example here.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,edp-phy.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Even though patch #1 in this series should be dropped, this patch
(patch #2) is still valid. Vinod: I assume this would land in your
tree along with the first two patches in Kuogee's series [1], which
are related. Please let me know if you need me to re-send or anything.

I have applied this patch, thanks

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1653507433-22585-1-git-send-email-quic_khsieh@quicinc.com/ (local)

This needs rebase on phy split which I have picked

-- 
~Vinod

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy