Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2021-11-30

Re: [PATCH resend v4 0/3] phy: Add driver for lan966x Serdes driver

From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Date: 2021-11-16 18:12:43
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Hello,

On 16/11/2021 12:52:28+0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
The 11/16/2021 17:13, Vinod Koul wrote:
quoted
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe

On 16-11-21, 11:56, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
quoted
The 11/16/2021 16:15, Vinod Koul wrote:
quoted
On 16-11-21, 11:21, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
quoted
The 11/16/2021 11:08, Horatiu Vultur wrote:

Hi Kison, Vinod,

Can you let me know if you have more comments to this patch series?
Otherwise can you ack on it? Because I would like to have the patches
merged via netdev if that is OK for you.
Any reason for merge thru netdev, there is no dependency and now with
merge window closed, I can pick this up..
Because I would like to send some patches for the lan966x network driver.
And these network patches depend on the serdes driver.
There cant be a compile time dependency... the network driver can use
the phy apis.. I dont think it is required here... Did I miss something
obvious?
You are right, there is no compile time dependency and the network
driver can use the PHY APIs.

But at runtime the network driver will need to configure the serdes
using the PHY API to be able to work properly.
It is fine if it doesn't work at runtime with only one branch, both will
get merged in linux-next and you can test with that if necessary. I'll
let both series go through separate trees.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help