RE: [PATCH 3/6] phy: renesas: Add RZ/G2L usb phy control driver
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Date: 2021-06-21 06:51:59
Also in:
linux-renesas-soc
Hi Vinod, Thanks for the feedback.
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] phy: renesas: Add RZ/G2L usb phy control driver On 11-06-21, 14:46, Biju Das wrote:quoted
+static int rzg2l_usbphycontrol_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; + struct rzg2l_usbphycontrol_drv *drv; + struct phy_provider *provider; + u32 val; + int n; + + if (!dev->of_node) { + dev_err(dev, "device tree not found\n"); + return -EINVAL; + }why do you think this would happen?
Not needed. Will take out.
quoted
+ + drv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drv), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!drv) + return -ENOMEM; + + drv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); + if (IS_ERR(drv->base)) + return PTR_ERR(drv->base); + + for (n = 0; n < NUM_PORTS; n++) { + struct rzg2l_phyctrl *phy = &drv->phyctrl[n]; + + phy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &rzg2l_usbphyctrl_ops); + if (IS_ERR(phy->phy)) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to create USBPHY Control\n"); + return PTR_ERR(phy->phy); + } + + if (n == 1) + phy->phy_reset_port_mask = PHY_RESET_PORT2;this looks inverted, should this logically not be:
Agreed. Will change this in v2.
if (n == 0) phy->phy_reset_port_mask = PHY_RESET_PORT1; ?quoted
+ else + phy->phy_reset_port_mask = PHY_RESET_PORT1; + + phy->drv = drv; + phy_set_drvdata(phy->phy, phy); + }; + + provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, + rzg2l_usbphycontrol_xlate);single line pls
OK. Regards, Biju
-- ~Vinod
-- linux-phy mailing list linux-phy@lists.infradead.org https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy