Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] perf arm64: Implement --topdown with metrics
From: John Garry <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-15 10:52:54
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Hi Andrew,
quoted
const struct pmu_event *metricgroup__find_metric(const char *metric, const struct pmu_events_map *map); int metricgroup__parse_groups_test(struct evlist *evlist,diff --git a/tools/perf/util/topdown.c b/tools/perf/util/topdown.c index 1081b20f9891..57c0c5f2c6bd 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/topdown.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/topdown.c@@ -56,3 +56,9 @@ __weak bool arch_topdown_sample_read(struct evsel *leader __maybe_unused) { return false; } + +__weak bool arch_topdown_use_json_metrics(void) +{
AFAICS, only x86 supports topdown today and that is because they have special kernel topdown events exposed for the kernel CPU PMU driver. So other architectures - not only arm - would need rely on metricgroups for topdown support. So let's make this generic for all archs.
I like this extension! I've ranted in the past about weak symbols breaking with archives due to lazy loading [1]. In this case tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/topdown.c has no other symbols within it and so the weak symbol has an extra chance of being linked incorrectly. We could add a new command line of --topdown-json to avoid this, but there seems little difference in doing this over just doing '-M TopDownL1'.
Is it possible to use the json metric approach for when the CPU version fails?
I think that's a good idea. In addition we could also add a --topdown arg to force using JSON metricgroups. Did you actually test this patch? I have something experimental working from some time ago, and it was more complicated than this. I need to check the code again... Thanks, John