Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: 2021-11-29 19:45:49
Also in:
bpf, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, lkml, netdev
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2023-02-13 · Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN · Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
- 2023-02-13 · Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN · Namhyung Kim <hidden>
- 2023-02-12 · Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN · Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
- 2023-02-12 · Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN · Yafang Shao <hidden>
- 2023-02-12 · Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] tools/testing/selftests/bpf: replace open-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN · Yafang Shao <hidden>
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:07:55 -0500 Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
I wonder if BTF could take advantage of the tracing: TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM() macros?
Bah' BTF does handle enums, it doesn't handle macros. But I wonder if we could do something similar for BTF. That is, force it. -- Steve