Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2021-08-20

Re: [PATCH] libperf evsel: Make use of FD robust.

From: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Date: 2021-08-20 00:13:27
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 4:30 PM Namhyung Kim [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Ian,

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:56 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Em Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:47:07PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
quoted
FD uses xyarray__entry that may return NULL if an index is out of
bounds. If NULL is returned then a segv happens as FD unconditionally
dereferences the pointer. This was happening in a case of with perf
iostat as shown below. The fix is to make FD an "int*" rather than an
int and handle the NULL case as either invalid input or a closed fd.

$ sudo gdb --args perf stat --iostat  list
...
Breakpoint 1, perf_evsel__alloc_fd (evsel=0x5555560951a0, ncpus=1, nthreads=1) at evsel.c:50
50      {
(gdb) bt
 #0  perf_evsel__alloc_fd (evsel=0x5555560951a0, ncpus=1, nthreads=1) at evsel.c:50
 #1  0x000055555585c188 in evsel__open_cpu (evsel=0x5555560951a0, cpus=0x555556093410,
    threads=0x555556086fb0, start_cpu=0, end_cpu=1) at util/evsel.c:1792
 #2  0x000055555585cfb2 in evsel__open (evsel=0x5555560951a0, cpus=0x0, threads=0x555556086fb0)
    at util/evsel.c:2045
 #3  0x000055555585d0db in evsel__open_per_thread (evsel=0x5555560951a0, threads=0x555556086fb0)
    at util/evsel.c:2065
 #4  0x00005555558ece64 in create_perf_stat_counter (evsel=0x5555560951a0,
    config=0x555555c34700 <stat_config>, target=0x555555c2f1c0 <target>, cpu=0) at util/stat.c:590
 #5  0x000055555578e927 in __run_perf_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0, run_idx=0)
    at builtin-stat.c:833
 #6  0x000055555578f3c6 in run_perf_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0, run_idx=0)
    at builtin-stat.c:1048
 #7  0x0000555555792ee5 in cmd_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at builtin-stat.c:2534
 #8  0x0000555555835ed3 in run_builtin (p=0x555555c3f540 <commands+288>, argc=3,
    argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:313
 #9  0x0000555555836154 in handle_internal_command (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:365
 #10 0x000055555583629f in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffe2ec, argv=0x7fffffffe2e0) at perf.c:409
 #11 0x0000555555836692 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:539
This callstack looks strange that 'perf iostat list' should not call
run_perf_stat() for the IOSTAT_LIST mode.

Hmm.. maybe it's because the --iostat option is declared
with OPT_CALLBACK_OPTARG which requires the option
to be specified like '--iostat=list' (not '--iostat list').

Anyway it should not crash..

Thanks,
Namhyung

quoted
quoted
...
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Error:
The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (uncore_iio_0/event=0x83,umask=0x04,ch_mask=0xF,fc_mask=0x07/).
/bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00005555559b03ea in perf_evsel__close_fd_cpu (evsel=0x5555560951a0, cpu=1) at evsel.c:166
166                     if (FD(evsel, cpu, thread) >= 0)
Humm

static void perf_evsel__close_fd_cpu(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int cpu)
{
        int thread;

        for (thread = 0; thread < xyarray__max_y(evsel->fd); ++thread) {
                if (FD(evsel, cpu, thread) >= 0)
                        close(FD(evsel, cpu, thread));
                FD(evsel, cpu, thread) = -1;
        }
}

void perf_evsel__close_fd(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
{
        int cpu;

        for (cpu = 0; cpu < xyarray__max_x(evsel->fd); cpu++)
                perf_evsel__close_fd_cpu(evsel, cpu);
}

Isn't bounds checking being performed by the callers?
It looks like things have been confused. There is a default case where
number of CPUs is set to 1, the caller with the segv is using the
affinity CPU code:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/evlist.c?h=perf/core#n1287

and so values other than 1 are passed, yielding the out of range
index, NULL and then the segv. I meant to send the stack trace at the
point of the segv, it is:

#0  0x00005555559b03ea in perf_evsel__close_fd_cpu
(evsel=0x5555560951a0, cpu=1) at evsel.c:166
#1  0x00005555559b05d1 in perf_evsel__close_cpu (evsel=0x5555560951a0,
cpu=1) at evsel.c:200
#2  0x0000555555853eb2 in evlist__close (evlist=0x555555e9b5c0) at
util/evlist.c:1287
#3  0x0000555555850eb1 in evlist__delete (evlist=0x555555e9b5c0) at
util/evlist.c:160
#4  0x0000555555793143 in cmd_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at
builtin-stat.c:2594
#5  0x0000555555835ed3 in run_builtin (p=0x555555c3f540 <commands+288>, argc=3,
    argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:313
#6  0x0000555555836154 in handle_internal_command (argc=3,
argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:365
#7  0x000055555583629f in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffe2ec,
argv=0x7fffffffe2e0) at perf.c:409
#8  0x0000555555836692 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffe4a0) at perf.c:539

Thanks,
Ian
quoted
- Arnaldo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help