Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 3 authors, 2017-06-20

Re: [PATCH v2] RFC perf test 14 add platform dependency

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-06-20 01:40:48

Em Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:59:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:09:37AM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote:
quoted
This is a proposal to add platform dependency into the
test case 14 (perf_event_attr). It is based on a suggestion from
Jiri Olsa.
Add a new optional attribute named 'machine' in the [config] section
of the test case file. It is a comma separated list of architecture
names this test can be executed on. For example:

machine = x86_64,alpha,ppc
'arch' sounds better to me, but machine is ok I guess
Agreed, for consistency with other places, like in struct machine, that
represents virtual and host 'machines' that have an 'arch', etc.

So better to rename "machine" above to "arch".
 
quoted
If this attribute is missing the test is executed on any platform.
This does not break the current setup.
The values listed for this attribute should be identical to
uname -m output.
If the list starts with an exclamation mark (!) the comparison is
inverted, for example for

machine = !s390x,ppc

the test is not executed on s390x or ppc platforms.
The exclamation mark must be at the beginnning of the list.
could that be per arch? this made me think that it's not s390 and it IS for ppc
yeah, having the ! affect just the arch right after it looks more
flexible and clear.
 
quoted
Here is an example debug output:
[root@s35lp76]# fgrep machine tests/attr/test-stat-C2
machine = x86_64,alpha,ppc
[root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \
  -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1

provides the following output:

running './tests/attr//test-stat-C1'
test executed only on 'x86_64,alpha,ppc' <--- new
  loading expected events
    Event event:base-stat
      fd = 1
      group_fd = -1
      .....
skipped [s390x] './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' <--- new
is this mixed output from supported and non supported archs?
if the arch is skip there's no output other than the skip line right?


ther than above nits it looks ok to me

thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help