Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1
From: Vineet Gupta <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-19 10:04:36
Also in:
lkml
From: Vineet Gupta <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-19 10:04:36
Also in:
lkml
On Monday 19 October 2015 03:22 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:46:35AM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote:quoted
quoted
On ARC we could use the atomic EXchange to implement a user space only binary semaphore - these atomic ops will be small duration so it is OK to spin wait for a little bit. That's how the old pthread library worked for ARC w/o any atomic support.That has the obvious problem of lock-holder-preemption and the horrible performance issues that result from that. I think the syscall at least has deterministic behaviour, whereas that userspace spin loop has this abysmal worst case thing.
I agree - we can add that syscall trivially and use it based on build time feature detection for atomics !