Re: Using a new perf tool against an older kernel
From: Frederic Weisbecker <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-24 00:11:54
Also in:
lkml
From: Frederic Weisbecker <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-24 00:11:54
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:02:15PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
On 06/23/2011 01:39 PM, Arun Sharma wrote:quoted
On 6/23/11 7:22 AM, David Ahern wrote:quoted
I have not seen issues like this using newer perf userspace against older kernels. For example, my laptop was running Fedora 14 (2.6.35) and now Fedora 15 (2.6.38.8) and I typically use latest perf builds (e.g., testing patches).I narrowed it down to PERF_SAMPLE_RAW: perf record -ag -- sleep 1 is fine, but: perf record -agR -- sleep 1 fails for me most of the time. The reason I needed to use the -R in the first place is that "perf script" fails on older kernels with: Samples do not contain timestamps. With the newer perf, I don't get errors, but the timestamp field is invalid. So I need to use the -R flag to get valid timestamps + stacktraces out of "perf script".That should have been fixed. And -T on record gets the timestamps. David
Right, it would be nice to suggest that from perf script when timestamps are not recorded.