Re: Perf ABI versioning
From: Frederic Weisbecker <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-24 20:40:55
Also in:
lkml
From: Frederic Weisbecker <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-24 20:40:55
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:39:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 21:34 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:quoted
But instead of a global tracing ABI number, I would rather suggest one number per tracepoint subsystem (sched, power, etc...). Ideally it would be per event, but sometimes those events tend to be renamed or a whole tracepoint subsystem refactored (see workqueue lately). Hence it might be better per subsystem.What's wrong with what we have? the /format file is pretty unique to function as a version number of you use a hash over it.
Yeah we could in fact use it to find if fields have been added, removed. Right, all in one that looks enough to me.