RE: [EXT] Re: nvme may get timeout from dd when using different non-prefetch mmio outbound/ranges
From: Li Chen <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-26 04:45:10
Also in:
linux-nvme, lkml
Hi, Keith
-----Original Message----- From: Keith Busch [mailto:kbusch@kernel.org] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 12:16 PM To: Li Chen Cc: Bjorn Helgaas; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; Lorenzo Pieralisi; Rob Herring; kw@linux.com; Bjorn Helgaas; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Tom Joseph; Jens Axboe; Christoph Hellwig; Sagi Grimberg; linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: nvme may get timeout from dd when using different non- prefetch mmio outbound/ranges On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 03:40:54AM +0000, Li Chen wrote:quoted
My nvme is " 05:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics CoLtd NVMe SSD Controller 980". From its datasheet, https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://s3.ap-northeast- 2.amazonaws.com/global.semi.static/Samsung_NVMe_SSD_980_Data_Sheet_R ev.1.1.pdf__;!!PeEy7nZLVv0!3MU3LdTWuzON9JMUkq29zwJM4d7g7wKtkiZszTu- PVepWchI_uLHpQGgdR_LEZM$ , it says nothing about CMB/SQEs, so I'm not sure. Is there other ways/tools(like nvme-cli) to query? The driver will export a sysfs property for it if it is supported: # cat /sys/class/nvme/nvme0/cmb If the file doesn't exist, then /dev/nvme0 doesn't have the capability.
# ls /sys/class/nvme/nvme0/ address model rescan_controller subsysnqn cntlid numa_node reset_controller subsystem dev nvme0n1 serial transport device power sqsize uevent firmware_rev queue_count state my nvme doesn't cmb.
quoted
quoted
quoted
I don't know how to interpret "ranges". Can you supply the dmesg and "lspci -vvs 0000:05:00.0" output both ways, e.g., pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x7f800000-0xefffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfd000000-0xfe7fffff window] pci 0000:05:00.0: [vvvv:dddd] type 00 class 0x... pci 0000:05:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x.....000-0x.....fff ...]quoted
Question: 1. Why dd can cause nvme timeout? Is there more debug ways?That means the nvme controller didn't provide a response to a posted command within the driver's latency tolerance.FYI, with the help of pci bridger's vendor, they find something interesting:"From catc log, I saw some memory read pkts sent from SSD card, but its memory range is within the memory range of switch down port. So, switch down port will replay UR pkt. It seems not normal." and "Why SSD card send out some memory pkts which memory address is within switch down port's memory range. If so, switch will response UR pkts". I also don't understand how can this happen? I think we can safely assume you're not attempting peer-to-peer, so that behavior as described shouldn't be happening. It sounds like the memory windows may be incorrect. The dmesg may help to show if something appears wrong.
Dmesg has been pasted in https://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=163522281024680&w=3 Yes, peer-to-peer cannot happen, nvme is my only ep: # lspci -i /usr/share/misc/pci.ids 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Cadence Design Systems, Inc. Device 0100 01:00.0 PCI bridge: Pericom Semiconductor Device c016 (rev 07) 02:02.0 PCI bridge: Pericom Semiconductor Device c016 (rev 06) 02:04.0 PCI bridge: Pericom Semiconductor Device c016 (rev 06) 02:06.0 PCI bridge: Pericom Semiconductor Device c016 (rev 06) 05:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd NVMe SSD Controller 980 ********************************************************************** This email and attachments contain Ambarella Proprietary and/or Confidential Information and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribute, copy, or print is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.