Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT schema changes for HiKey970 PCIe hardware to work
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-12 07:48:16
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-phy, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2021-08-03 · Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT schema changes for HiKey970 PCIe hardware to work · Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
- 2021-08-03 · [PATCH v3 0/4] DT schema changes for HiKey970 PCIe hardware to work · Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Em Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:13:32 -0500 Rob Herring [off-list ref] escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 1:46 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Em Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:13:48 -0600 Rob Herring [off-list ref] escreveu:quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
compatible = "pciclass,0604"; device_type = "pci"; #address-cells = <3>; #size-cells = <2>; ranges; }; pcie@1,0 { // Lane 4: M.2These 3 nodes (1, 5, 7) need to be child nodes of the above node.This was the main issue.Ok, placing 1, 5, 7 as child nodes of 0 worked, with the attached DT schema: $ ls -l $(find /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/ -name of_node) lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/of_node -> ../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:01.0/of_node -> ../../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@1,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:01.0/pci_bus/0000:03/of_node -> ../../../../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@1,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:05.0/of_node -> ../../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@5,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:05.0/pci_bus/0000:05/of_node -> ../../../../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@5,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:07.0/of_node -> ../../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@7,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:07.0/pci_bus/0000:06/of_node -> ../../../../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@7,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/of_node -> ../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/0000:01:00.0/pci_bus/0000:02/of_node -> ../../../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/of_node -> ../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/pci_bus/0000:01/of_node -> ../../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 ago 11 08:43 /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/pci_bus/0000:00/of_node -> ../../../../../../../firmware/devicetree/base/soc/pcie@f4000000This all looks right to me, but...quoted
The logs also seem OK on my eyes: [ 3.911082] (null): pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000 [ 4.001104] pci 0000:00:00.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000 [ 4.043609] pci_bus 0000:01: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0 [ 4.076756] pci 0000:01:00.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0 [ 4.120652] pci_bus 0000:02: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0 [ 4.150766] pci 0000:02:01.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0 [ 4.196413] pci 0000:02:04.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0 [ 4.238896] pci 0000:02:05.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0 [ 4.280116] pci 0000:02:07.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0 [ 4.309821] pci 0000:02:09.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0...these do not.
For the above:
s/of_node:/BUS of_node:/
The debug printk is misleading. It is actually printing the BUS of_node:
void pci_set_of_node(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "%s: of_node: %pOF\n",
__func__, dev->bus->dev.of_node);
if (!dev->bus->dev.of_node)
return;
...
If I move it to the right place, e. g.:
void pci_set_of_node(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
if (!dev->bus->dev.of_node) {
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "%s: BUS of_node is null\n",
__func__, dev->bus->dev.of_node);
return;
}
dev->dev.of_node = of_pci_find_child_device(dev->bus->dev.of_node,
dev->devfn);
if (dev->dev.of_node)
dev->dev.fwnode = &dev->dev.of_node->fwnode;
dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "%s: of_node: %pOF\n",
__func__, dev->dev.of_node);
}
It will produce:
[ 4.155771] (null): pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000
[ 4.208740] pci 0000:00:00.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0
[ 4.236759] pci_bus 0000:01: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0
[ 4.257899] pci 0000:01:00.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0
[ 4.310350] pci_bus 0000:02: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0
[ 4.337784] pci 0000:02:01.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@1,0
[ 4.370998] pci 0000:02:04.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: (null)
[ 4.391459] pci 0000:02:05.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@5,0
[ 4.415378] pci 0000:02:07.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@7,0
[ 4.439420] pci 0000:02:09.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: (null)
[ 4.494288] pci_bus 0000:03: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@1,0
[ 4.511394] pci_bus 0000:04: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: (null)
[ 4.525084] pci_bus 0000:05: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@5,0
[ 4.542173] pci_bus 0000:06: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: /soc/pcie@f4000000/pcie@0,0/pcie@0,0/pcie@7,0
[ 4.578575] pci 0000:06:00.0: pci_set_of_node: of_node: (null)
[ 4.612159] pci_bus 0000:07: pci_set_bus_of_node: of_node: (null)
Which reflects the PCIe topology.
Thanks,
Mauro