Re: [PATCH 26/34] docs: PCI: endpoint: pci-endpoint-cfs.rst: avoid using ReSt :doc:`foo` markup
flat view
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-06-11 08:45:16
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml
Em Thu, 10 Jun 2021 18:46:22 -0500 Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] escreveu:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:18:25PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:quoted
The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py. So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>It'd be nice to know why we're doing this and what the benefit is.
That came from an upstream discussion, mentioned on patch 00/34: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/871r9k6rmy.fsf@meer.lwn.net/ (local) Basically, using Documentation/.../foo.rst allows some text editors to navigate directly to the file. Also, there's a preference from some maintainers to keep the ReST files as close as possible to plain text.
Maybe if you know more about ReSt, it's obvious that using :doc:`foo` is wrong and produces the wrong output or something. But I don't know.
It is more a matter of preference. That's said, there is indeed an issue with the current builder: when using SPHINXDIRS="book", doc:`foo` references may not work well. For instance, if one is building just the driver-api book, a reference like :doc:`../admin-guide/foo` can't be solved and will produce a warning, plus a bad output. By using Documentation/admin-guide/foo.rst, it will simply be displayed as a text without producing any harm. We discussed in the past about that, but we didn't reach to any conclusion about the proper way to fix it.
I do think the pathname in the new text is easier for plain-text readers to follow.
Yes.
(What's the correct spelling of "ReSt", BTW? The cover letter has "ReST", this patch has "ReSt", wikipedia says "RST, ReST, or reST".)
ReSt was a typo.. sorry for that. I guess the proper way is ReST, but several places use RST instead. For instance, the conversion tool pandoc uses "rst" to refer to this format.
But anyway, Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Thanks! Mauro
quoted
--- Documentation/PCI/endpoint/pci-endpoint-cfs.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/endpoint/pci-endpoint-cfs.rst b/Documentation/PCI/endpoint/pci-endpoint-cfs.rst index 696f8eeb4738..db609b97ad58 100644 --- a/Documentation/PCI/endpoint/pci-endpoint-cfs.rst +++ b/Documentation/PCI/endpoint/pci-endpoint-cfs.rst@@ -125,4 +125,4 @@ all the EPF devices are created and linked with the EPC device. | interrupt_pin | function -[1] :doc:`pci-endpoint` +[1] Documentation/PCI/endpoint/pci-endpoint.rst-- 2.31.1
Thanks, Mauro