Re: [PATCH] pci: remove redundant function calls in pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment()
From: Lin Feng <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-28 08:56:28
Also in:
lkml
On 12/28/2012 03:45 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Lin Feng [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment() potentially calls pci_specified_resource_alignment() twice, which is redundant. pci_is_reassigndev() is only called in pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment(), and from sematic/functionality aspects pci_specified_resource_alignment() is sufficient to substitute, so also make some cleanup. Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <redacted> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> --- drivers/pci/pci.c | 16 ++-------------- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index 5cb5820..789f401 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c@@ -3766,18 +3766,6 @@ resource_size_t pci_specified_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev) return align; } -/** - * pci_is_reassigndev - check if specified PCI is target device to reassign - * @dev: the PCI device to check - * - * RETURNS: non-zero for PCI device is a target device to reassign, - * or zero is not. - */ -int pci_is_reassigndev(struct pci_dev *dev) -{ - return (pci_specified_resource_alignment(dev) != 0); -} - /* * This function disables memory decoding and releases memory resources * of the device specified by kernel's boot parameter 'pci=resource_alignment='.@@ -3792,7 +3780,8 @@ void pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev) resource_size_t align, size; u16 command; - if (!pci_is_reassigndev(dev)) + align = pci_specified_resource_alignment(dev); + if (!align) return; if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL &&@@ -3808,7 +3797,6 @@ void pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev) command &= ~PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY; pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, command); - align = pci_specified_resource_alignment(dev); for (i = 0; i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; i++) { r = &dev->resource[i]; if (!(r->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)) --1.7.1looks the same as the one that i posted 6 months ago. http://copilotco.com/mail-archives/linux-kernel.2012/msg18498.html
Sorry, I didn't notice your patchset before :) Yes, they are the same. But why does nobody care this?
Yinghai