Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] ACPI, PCI: add hostbridge removal function
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: 2012-09-28 14:16:38
Also in:
linux-acpi
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Taku Izumi [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:48:09 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Taku Izumi [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
@@ -661,6 +663,11 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_remove(struct a device_set_run_wake(root->bus->bridge, false); pci_acpi_remove_bus_pm_notifier(device); + acpi_pci_irq_del_prt(root->bus);acpi_pci_irq_del_prt() does not actually have a dependency on the struct pci_bus, so I think its interface should be changed so it takes a segment number and a bus number instead of the "struct pci_bus *". The same applies to acpi_pci_irq_add_prt(). This basically boils down to reverting 859a3f86ca8 and d9efae3688a. I acked those changes at the time, but I think they were a mistake. The reason is that passing in the struct pci_bus * ties them into the host bridge add/remove flow in a way that's not necessary. If we get rid of the struct pci_bus * dependency, then we can easily add the _PRT before doing PCI enumeration behind the bridge, and we can remove the _PRT after removing the PCI devices. I think this is one small step toward getting rid of the add/start and stop/remove split.I'm going to work on doing this if nobody else is interested.I'll do that. Maybee that is separeted from this patchset.Great, thanks! A separate patchset is definitely fine.
Whether this is a waste of time or not, I don't know. But I did a little bit of work on this before you volunteered, Taku. Sorry, I should have pointed you at the work-in-progress patches; maybe they could have saved you a bit of time. Anyway, here they are: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pci/bjorn-misc