Hi Tony,

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 7:24 PM Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] wrote:

* Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref] [211007 13:27]:

quoted

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 2:49 PM Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Even without clocks and power domains configured, simple-pm-bus is still
different from simple-bus as simple-pm-bus enables runtime PM for the bus
driver.

Which you need to have working Runtime PM for child devices, right? ;-)

Right. And based on what I remember we simply cannot do pm_runtime_enable()
for simple-bus without breaking tons of devices.

Why not? Do you have an example of what would break?
The only reason I created simple-pm-bus was because the DT people
objected to adding PM to simple-bus, as they considered it wrong
conceptually.  AFAIK this wouldn't have caused any actual breakage.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds