Re: [PATCHv2] Input: omap4-keypad: Add pinctrl support
From: Felipe Balbi <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-24 17:05:10
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-input, lkml
Hi, On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:18:01AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:54:23PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:quoted
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Dmitry Torokhov [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I have seen just in a few days 3 or 4 drivers having exactly the same change - call to devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(), and I guess I will receive the same patches for the rest of input drivers shortly. This suggests that the operation is done at the wrong level. Do the pin configuration as you parse DT data, the same way you set up i2c devices registers in of_i2c.c, and leave the individual drivers that do not care about specifics alone.Exactly this can be done with pinctrl hogs. The problem with that is that it removes the cross-reference between the device and it's pinctrl handle (also from the device tree). Instead the pinctrl handle gets referenced to the pin controller itself. So from a modelling perpective this looks a bit ugly. So we have two kinds of ugly: - Sprinke devm_pinctrl_get_select_default() over all drivers which makes pinctrl handles properly reference their devices - Use hogs and loose coupling between pinctrl handles and their devices A third alternative as outlined is to use notifiers and some resource core in drivers/base/*OK, so with drivers/base/, have you considered doing default pinctrl selection in bus's probe() methods? Yo would select the default configuration before starting probing the device and maybe select idle when probe fails or device is unbound? That would still keep the link between device object and pinctrl and there less busses than device drivers out there.
it starts to become confusing after a while. I mean, there's a reason why all drivers explictly call pm_runtim_enable(), right ? From a first thought, one could think of just yanking that into bus' probe() as you may suggest, but sometimes the device is already enabled, so we need extra tricks: pm_runtime_set_active(); pm_runtime_enable(); pm_runtime_get(); the same could happen with pinctrl eventually. What if a device needs to do something else (an errata fix as an example) before requesting pinctrl's default state ? -- balbi
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 836 bytes