Re: [PATCH] omap2/omapfb: make DBG() more resistant in if-else constructions
From: Tomi Valkeinen <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-10 12:08:12
Also in:
linux-fbdev, lkml
From: Tomi Valkeinen <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-10 12:08:12
Also in:
linux-fbdev, lkml
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 11:42 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
What about using the standard pr_debug()/dev_dbg() instead? With dynamic debug, it can be enabled at run time. As a bonus, you get printf()-style format checking if debugging is disabled.
Yes, dev_dbg & co. would be better. However, one thing I dislike about them is the extra stuff they print. For example, for omapfb and omapdss dev_dbg will print: omapfb omapfb: foo omapdss_dss omapdss_dss: foo I originally added the debug macros to omapdss to be able to automatically print the DSS module name, as at that point there was only one big omapdss device. And I guess I just followed with similar macro in omapfb also. But I believe both omapdss and omapfb should be changed to dev_* prints sometime soon. Tomi