Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] OMAP: IOMMU: add support to callback during fault handling
From: David Cohen <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-16 16:28:49
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:10 PM, David Cohen [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Hiroshi DOYU [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi David,Hi Hiroshi,quoted
Sorry for a bit late reply....You're just in time. :)quoted
From: David Cohen <redacted> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] OMAP: IOMMU: add support to callback during fault handling Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:36:31 +0200quoted
Add support to register a callback for IOMMU fault situations. Drivers using IOMMU module might want to be informed when such errors happen in order to debug it or react. Signed-off-by: David Cohen <redacted> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c | 21 +++++++++++++-- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu.h | 15 ++++++++++- arch/arm/plat-omap/iommu.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c index 14ee686..504310d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c@@ -143,10 +143,10 @@ static void omap2_iommu_set_twl(struct iommu *obj, bool on)__iommu_set_twl(obj, false); } -static u32 omap2_iommu_fault_isr(struct iommu *obj, u32 *ra) +static u32 omap2_iommu_fault_isr(struct iommu *obj, u32 *ra, u32 *iommu_errs) { int i; - u32 stat, da; + u32 stat, da, errs; const char *err_msg[] = { "tlb miss", "translation fault",@@ -157,8 +157,10 @@ static u32 omap2_iommu_fault_isr(struct iommu *obj, u32 *ra)stat = iommu_read_reg(obj, MMU_IRQSTATUS); stat &= MMU_IRQ_MASK; - if (!stat) + if (!stat) { + *iommu_errs = 0; return 0; + } da = iommu_read_reg(obj, MMU_FAULT_AD); *ra = da;@@ -171,6 +173,19 @@ static u32 omap2_iommu_fault_isr(struct iommu *obj, u32 *ra)} printk("\n"); + errs = 0; + if (stat & MMU_IRQ_TLBMISS) + errs |= OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_TLB_MISS; + if (stat & MMU_IRQ_TRANSLATIONFAULT) + errs |= OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_TRANS_FAULT; + if (stat & MMU_IRQ_EMUMISS) + errs |= OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_EMU_MISS; + if (stat & MMU_IRQ_TABLEWALKFAULT) + errs |= OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_TBLWALK_FAULT; + if (stat & MMU_IRQ_MULTIHITFAULT) + errs |= OMAP_IOMMU_ERR_MULTIHIT_FAULT; + *iommu_errs = errs; + iommu_write_reg(obj, stat, MMU_IRQSTATUS); return stat;diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu.h index 19cbb5e..5a2475f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/iommu.h@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct iommu {struct clk *clk; void __iomem *regbase; struct device *dev; + void *fault_cb_priv; unsigned int refcount; struct mutex iommu_lock; /* global for this whole object */@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ struct iommu {struct mutex mmap_lock; /* protect mmap */ int (*isr)(struct iommu *obj); + void (*fault_cb)(struct iommu *obj, u32 da, u32 iommu_errs, void *priv);What about making use of (*isr)() for fault call back as well? Basic concept is that, client can decide how to deal with iommu fault. For example, for advanced case, client wants daynamic loading of TLB(or PTE), or for ISP case, clients just want more appropriate fault reporting. This (*isr)() could be used in such flexibility.In this case, it seems we can re-use it.quoted
785 * Device IOMMU generic operations 786 */ 787 static irqreturn_t iommu_fault_handler(int irq, void *data) 788 { 789 u32 stat, da; 790 u32 *iopgd, *iopte; 791 int err = -EIO; 792 struct iommu *obj = data; 793 794 if (!obj->refcount) 795 return IRQ_NONE; 796 797 /* Dynamic loading TLB or PTE */ 798 if (obj->isr) 799 err = obj->isr(obj); 800 801 if (!err) 802 return IRQ_HANDLED; 803 804 clk_enable(obj->clk); 805 stat = iommu_report_fault(obj, &da); 806 clk_disable(obj->clk); 807 if (!stat) 808 return IRQ_HANDLED; 809 810 iommu_disable(obj); I guess that this modifying the above code could make (*isr)() flexible to be used for any purpose for clients? For me, having both following may be a bit residual.
There are few possible issues in this case. (*isr)() is meant to replace the generic fault handler on iommu, but the fault callback isn't. Basically fault callback needs to call specific iommu fault report to know faulty 'da' and iommu errors, so part of the generic fault handler must be called. One possible solution is always call specific fault report before (*isr)(). IMO it makes sense as (*isr)() might want to know at least the current faults. But in this case, specific fault report should not print anything else as only the upper layer and user will know when a fault is actually an error or not. So, they're responsible for error messages. I'm sending a v3 with these changes. Comments will be welcome. Br, David
I agree. We need to add 'void *isr_priv' to iommu struct and the function to register isr. I'll send a v3 soon. Regards, Davidquoted
quoted
int (*isr)(struct iommu *obj); + void (*fault_cb)(struct iommu *obj, u32 da, u32 iommu_errs, void *priv);
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html