Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2010-12-22
STALE5656d

[PATCH 1/2] omap: rx51: Cleanup vdds_sdi supply construction

From: Jarkko Nikula <hidden>
Date: 2010-12-21 17:25:34
Also in: linux-arm-kernel
Subsystem: arm port, omap2+ support, the rest · Maintainers: Russell King, Aaro Koskinen, Andreas Kemnade, Kevin Hilman, Roger Quadros, Tony Lindgren, Linus Torvalds

It is much more cleaner to use REGULATOR_SUPPLY macro and a device name
instead of having a reference to rx51_display_device.dev with #if defined()
guards.

Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c |   11 +----------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
index fd95ccf..768f0dc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
@@ -359,17 +359,8 @@ static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vio_supplies[] = {
 	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("DVDD", "2-0019"),
 };
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_MODULE)
-extern struct platform_device rx51_display_device;
-#endif
-
 static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vaux1_consumers[] = {
-#if defined(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_FB_OMAP2_MODULE)
-	{
-		.supply	= "vdds_sdi",
-		.dev	= &rx51_display_device.dev,
-	},
-#endif
+	REGULATOR_SUPPLY("vdds_sdi", "omapdss"),
 };
 
 static struct regulator_init_data rx51_vaux1 = {
-- 
1.7.2.3
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help