Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] Add command id quirk for fabrics
From: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Date: 2021-11-09 16:59:31
On 11/9/2021 6:15 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 03:31:02PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:23:33PM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:quoted
On 11/9/2021 3:15 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
Max, if you can't point us to a broken target (and yes, it is broken) this will not go anywhere.Any target that uses Apple device as backend can be harmed. Most simple example is Linux PT target that copy the sqe as-is and passes it to the NVMe Apple drive.Take another close look at how command_id are assigned my Linux driver. We obviously do not pass it through as that would be completely broken.Also worth noting this driver has always defined the command id as a __u16, not __le16, yet we don't have any bug reports from big-endian hosts.
Right, my bad. I thought that the pass-through target uses the same id. Linux PT target works fine. Bad example. Linux kernel world is covered but I still think we need to add this ability for fabrics controllers as we did for pci controllers. There are a lot of vendors out there with their optimizations and solutions and by adding some code to cover a broken TCP target (that no one said what is this target and why nobody fixed it) by default that hurts others (even if it's spec compliant) is not a good practice.