Re: [PATCH] Revert "nvme: verify MNAN value if ANA is enabled"
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-12 19:18:50
On 6/11/21 02:17, Daniel Wagner wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 09:01:14PM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:quoted
commit 1368a1a5e7566d726bf74234d05895c3f0d54690 Author: Chaitanya Kulkarni [off-list ref] Date: Wed Jun 9 20:07:00 2021 -0700 nvme: fix the comparison in the mnan check The existing check for the valid mnan value will result in the error when ctrl->max_namespaces are set to the 1024 from NVMeOF target since !1024 == 0 so it will lead to next comparison 1024 > is->nn which will be always true untill target has 1024 namespaces.The commit message doesn't make sense to me. NSID is not limited to 1024. From the discussion in the other mail, I though the argument is, if there are no namespaces on the target the MNAN is allowed to be zero. The original check assumed there are always namespaces. The proposed fix drops the first half of the specs statement: ... then this field shall be set to a non-zero value that is less than or equal to the NN value.
But that will require any controller to have at least one namespace, with current implementation we don't enforce that behavior, maybe then we should check that in the discovery or id controller path if ANA log page is supported ? _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme