[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation... | linux-nvme

[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads · sagi@grimberg.me (Sagi Grimberg) · 2016-08-01
[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads · hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig) · 2016-08-02
[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads · sagi@grimberg.me (Sagi Grimberg) · 2016-08-02
[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads · Jason Gunthorpe <hidden> · 2016-08-02
[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads · sagi@grimberg.me (Sagi Grimberg) · 2016-08-03
[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads · hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig) · 2016-08-03
[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads · sagi@grimberg.me (Sagi Grimberg) · 2016-08-03
[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads · hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig) · 2016-08-04

STALE3612d

[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads

From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-02 16:15:26
Also in: linux-rdma

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016@04:38:58PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:

that is currently being sent (its a rare race condition, but
theoretically possible). The reason is that we repost the inline data
buffer for receive before we post the send request. We used to have

?? The same buffer is posted at the same time for send and recv? That
is never OK, SRQ or not.

Jason

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help