There is probably a better way to do this that doesn't repeat anything.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303071503.shUSoIpC-lkp@intel.com/ (local)
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/lockd/trace.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Chuck, I'm fine if you want to just fold this into the original
tracepoint patch too. Also, let me know if you see a way to express this
better.
diff --git a/fs/lockd/trace.h b/fs/lockd/trace.h
index 3e84e3efaf22..11f1381b566c 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/trace.h
+++ b/fs/lockd/trace.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/nfs.h>
#include <linux/lockd/lockd.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKD_V4
#define show_nlm_status(val) \
__print_symbolic(val, \
{ NLM_LCK_GRANTED, "LCK_GRANTED" }, \@@ -22,6 +23,15 @@
{ NLM_STALE_FH, "STALE_FH" }, \
{ NLM_FBIG, "FBIG" }, \
{ NLM_FAILED, "FAILED" })
+#else
+#define show_nlm_status(val) \
+ __print_symbolic(val, \
+ { NLM_LCK_GRANTED, "LCK_GRANTED" }, \
+ { NLM_LCK_DENIED, "LCK_DENIED" }, \
+ { NLM_LCK_DENIED_NOLOCKS, "LCK_DENIED_NOLOCKS" }, \
+ { NLM_LCK_BLOCKED, "LCK_BLOCKED" }, \
+ { NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD, "LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD" })
+#endif
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(nlmclnt_lock_event,
TP_PROTO(--
2.39.2