Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2023-03-10
STALE1197d

[PATCH] lockd: fix tracepoint status name definitions when CONFIG_LOCKD_V4 isn't defined

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-03-10 15:44:59
Subsystem: filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), kernel nfsd, sunrpc, and lockd servers, nfs, sunrpc, and lockd clients, the rest · Maintainers: Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Chuck Lever, Jeff Layton, Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Linus Torvalds

There is probably a better way to do this that doesn't repeat anything.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303071503.shUSoIpC-lkp@intel.com/ (local)
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
 fs/lockd/trace.h | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

Chuck, I'm fine if you want to just fold this into the original
tracepoint patch too. Also, let me know if you see a way to express this
better.
diff --git a/fs/lockd/trace.h b/fs/lockd/trace.h
index 3e84e3efaf22..11f1381b566c 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/trace.h
+++ b/fs/lockd/trace.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/nfs.h>
 #include <linux/lockd/lockd.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKD_V4
 #define show_nlm_status(val)							\
 	__print_symbolic(val,							\
 		{ NLM_LCK_GRANTED,		"LCK_GRANTED" },		\
@@ -22,6 +23,15 @@
 		{ NLM_STALE_FH,			"STALE_FH" },			\
 		{ NLM_FBIG,			"FBIG" },			\
 		{ NLM_FAILED,			"FAILED" })
+#else
+#define show_nlm_status(val)							\
+	__print_symbolic(val,							\
+		{ NLM_LCK_GRANTED,		"LCK_GRANTED" },		\
+		{ NLM_LCK_DENIED,		"LCK_DENIED" },			\
+		{ NLM_LCK_DENIED_NOLOCKS,	"LCK_DENIED_NOLOCKS" },		\
+		{ NLM_LCK_BLOCKED,		"LCK_BLOCKED" },		\
+		{ NLM_LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD,	"LCK_DENIED_GRACE_PERIOD" })
+#endif
 
 DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(nlmclnt_lock_event,
 		TP_PROTO(
-- 
2.39.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help