Re: [PATCH RFC v8 1/2] fs/lock: add new callback, lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations
From: Chuck Lever III <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-14 23:41:50
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Dec 13, 2021, at 12:24 PM, Dai Ngo [off-list ref] wrote: Add new callback, lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate action to resolve the lock conflict if possible. The callback takes 2 arguments, file_lock of the blocker and a testonly flag: testonly = 1 check and return lock manager's private data if lock conflict can be resolved else return NULL. testonly = 0 resolve the conflict if possible, return true if conflict was resolved esle return false. Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client (client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns the lock. Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com> --- fs/locks.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/linux/fs.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 3d6fb4ae847b..5f3ea40ce2aa 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c@@ -952,8 +952,11 @@ voidposix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl) { struct file_lock *cfl; + struct file_lock *checked_cfl = NULL; struct file_lock_context *ctx; struct inode *inode = locks_inode(filp); + void *res_data; + void *(*func)(void *priv, bool testonly); ctx = smp_load_acquire(&inode->i_flctx); if (!ctx || list_empty_careful(&ctx->flc_posix)) {@@ -962,11 +965,24 @@ posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)} spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock); +retry: list_for_each_entry(cfl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) { - if (posix_locks_conflict(fl, cfl)) { - locks_copy_conflock(fl, cfl); - goto out; + if (!posix_locks_conflict(fl, cfl)) + continue; + if (checked_cfl != cfl && cfl->fl_lmops && + cfl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock) { + res_data = cfl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock(cfl, true); + if (res_data) { + func = cfl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock; + spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); + func(res_data, false); + spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock); + checked_cfl = cfl; + goto retry; + } }
Dai and I discussed this offline. Depending on a pointer to represent exactly the same struct file_lock across a dropped spinlock is racy. Dai plans to investigate other mechanisms to perform this check reliably.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ locks_copy_conflock(fl, cfl); + goto out; } fl->fl_type = F_UNLCK; out:@@ -1136,10 +1152,13 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,struct file_lock *new_fl2 = NULL; struct file_lock *left = NULL; struct file_lock *right = NULL; + struct file_lock *checked_fl = NULL; struct file_lock_context *ctx; int error; bool added = false; LIST_HEAD(dispose); + void *res_data; + void *(*func)(void *priv, bool testonly); ctx = locks_get_lock_context(inode, request->fl_type); if (!ctx)@@ -1166,9 +1185,24 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,* blocker's list of waiters and the global blocked_hash. */ if (request->fl_type != F_UNLCK) { +retry: list_for_each_entry(fl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) { if (!posix_locks_conflict(request, fl)) continue; + if (checked_fl != fl && fl->fl_lmops && + fl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock) { + res_data = fl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock(fl, true); + if (res_data) { + func = fl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock; + spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); + percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem); + func(res_data, false); + percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem); + spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock); + checked_fl = fl; + goto retry; + } + } if (conflock) locks_copy_conflock(conflock, fl); error = -EAGAIN;diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index e7a633353fd2..8cb910c3a394 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h@@ -1071,6 +1071,7 @@ struct lock_manager_operations {int (*lm_change)(struct file_lock *, int, struct list_head *); void (*lm_setup)(struct file_lock *, void **); bool (*lm_breaker_owns_lease)(struct file_lock *); + void *(*lm_expire_lock)(void *priv, bool testonly); }; struct lock_manager { -- 2.9.5
-- Chuck Lever