On 30 Aug 2021, at 11:56, schumaker.anna@gmail.com wrote:

From: Anna Schumaker <redacted>

okay, or would it be better to name it "nfs" with "sysfs" as a
subcommand? Going with just "nfs" as the command name would allow us to
add other non-sysfs tools as subcommands in the future (such as `nfs stat`
to call `nfsstat`, or for new commands that would otherwise be prefixed
with "nfs")

Thoughts?

I'm in favor of having a top-level nfs command tree for tools and
administrators, and even dropping the intermediate "sysfs" bit for these
subcommands.  I'd like to use `nfs xprt` and `nfs rpc-client`..etc.  I think
that the intermediate 'sysfs' is unnecessary.

If I can ever get around to completing it, I have some work for displaying
mount to xprt relationships and forcibly unmounting for unavailable servers
where I would like to use `nfs shutdown` or some variation.

Ben