Re: [PATCH 4/4] NFS: Fix fscache read from NFS after cache error
From: Trond Myklebust <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-29 15:50:18
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 11:29 -0400, David Wysochanski wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:54 AM Trond Myklebust [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 09:20 -0400, David Wysochanski wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 8:46 AM Trond Myklebust [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 05:17 -0400, David Wysochanski wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:39 PM Trond Myklebust [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 19:46 -0400, David Wysochanski wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 5:59 PM Trond Myklebust [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 17:12 -0400, David Wysochanski wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 3:09 PM Trond Myklebust [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 13:39 -0400, Dave Wysochanski wrote:quoted
Earlier commits refactored some NFS read code and removed nfs_readpage_async(), but neglected to properly fixup nfs_readpage_from_fscache_complete(). The code path is only hit when something unusual occurs with the cachefiles backing filesystem, such as an IO error or while a cookie is being invalidated. Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski [off-list ref] --- fs/nfs/fscache.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/nfs/fscache.c b/fs/nfs/fscache.c index c4c021c6ebbd..d308cb7e1dd4 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/fscache.c +++ b/fs/nfs/fscache.c@@ -381,15 +381,25 @@ static voidnfs_readpage_from_fscache_complete(struct page *page, void *context, int error) { + struct nfs_readdesc desc; + struct inode *inode = page->mapping-quoted
host;+ dfprintk(FSCACHE, "NFS: readpage_from_fscache_complete (0x%p/0x%p/%d)\n", page, context, error); - /* if the read completes with an error, we just unlock the page and let - * the VM reissue the readpage */ if (!error) { SetPageUptodate(page); unlock_page(page); + } else { + desc.ctx = context; + nfs_pageio_init_read(&desc.pgio, inode, false, + &nfs_async_read_completion_ops); + error = readpage_async_filler(&desc, page); + if (error) + return;This code path can clearly fail too. Why can we not fix this code to allow it to return that reported error so that we can handle the failure case in nfs_readpage() instead of dead- ending here?Maybe the below patch is what you had in mind? That way if fscache is enabled, nfs_readpage() should behave the same way as if it's not, for the case where an IO error occurs in the NFS read completion path. If we call into fscache and we get back that the IO has been submitted, wait until it is completed, so we'll catch any IO errors in the read completion path. This does not solve the "catch the internal errors", IOW, the ones that show up as pg_error, that will probably require copying pg_error into nfs_open_context.error field.diff --git a/fs/nfs/read.c b/fs/nfs/read.c index 78b9181e94ba..28e3318080e0 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/read.c +++ b/fs/nfs/read.c@@ -357,13 +357,13 @@ int nfs_readpage(struct file*file, struct page *page) } else desc.ctx = get_nfs_open_context(nfs_file_open_context(file)); + xchg(&desc.ctx->error, 0); if (!IS_SYNC(inode)) { ret = nfs_readpage_from_fscache(desc.ctx, inode, page); if (ret == 0) - goto out; + goto out_wait; } - xchg(&desc.ctx->error, 0); nfs_pageio_init_read(&desc.pgio, inode, false, &nfs_async_read_completion_ops);@@ -373,6 +373,7 @@ int nfs_readpage(struct file*file, struct page *page) nfs_pageio_complete_read(&desc.pgio); ret = desc.pgio.pg_error < 0 ? desc.pgio.pg_error : 0; +out_wait: if (!ret) { ret = wait_on_page_locked_killable(page); if (!PageUptodate(page) && !ret)quoted
quoted
+ + nfs_pageio_complete_read(&desc.pgio); } }-- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace trond.myklebust@hammerspace.comYes, please. This avoids that duplication of NFS read code in the fscache layer.If you mean patch 4 we still need that - I don't see anyway to avoid it. The above just will make the fscache enabled path waits for the IO to complete, same as the non- fscache case.With the above, you can simplify patch 4/4 to just make the page unlock unconditional on the error, no? i.e. if (!error) SetPageUptodate(page); unlock_page(page); End result: the client just does the same check as before and let's the vfs/mm decide based on the status of the PG_uptodate flag what to do next. I'm assuming that a retry won't cause fscache to do another bio attempt?Yes I think you're right and I'm following - let me test it and I'll send a v2. Then we can drop patch #3 right?Sounds good. Thanks Dave!This approach works but it differs from the original when an fscache error occurs. The original (see below) would call back into NFS to read from the server, but now we just let the VM handle it. The VM will re-issue the read, but will go back into fscache again (because it's enabled), which may fail again.How about marking the page on failure, then? I don't believe we currently use PG_owner_priv_1 (a.k.a. PageOwnerPriv1, PageChecked, PagePinned, PageForeign, PageSwapCache, PageXenRemapped) for anything and according to legend it is supposed to be usable by the fs for page cache pages. So what say we use SetPageChecked() to mark the page as having failed retrieval from fscache?So this? I confirm this patch on top of the one I just sent works. Want me to merge them together and send a v3? Author: Dave Wysochanski [off-list ref] Date: Tue Jun 29 11:10:15 2021 -0400 NFS: Mark page with PG_checked if fscache IO completes in error If fscache is enabled and we try to read from fscache, but the IO fails, mark the page with PG_checked. Then when the VM re-issues the IO, skip over fscache and just read from the server. Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski [off-list ref]diff --git a/fs/nfs/fscache.c b/fs/nfs/fscache.c index 0966e147e973..687e98b08994 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/fscache.c +++ b/fs/nfs/fscache.c@@ -404,10 +404,12 @@ static voidnfs_readpage_from_fscache_complete(struct page *page, "NFS: readpage_from_fscache_complete (0x%p/0x%p/%d)\n", page, context, error); - /* if the read completes with an error, unlock the page and let - * the VM reissue the readpage */ + /* if the read completes with an error, mark the page with PG_checked, + * unlock the page, and let the VM reissue the readpage */ if (!error) SetPageUptodate(page); + else + SetPageChecked(page); unlock_page(page); }@@ -423,6 +425,11 @@ int __nfs_readpage_from_fscache(structnfs_open_context *ctx, "NFS: readpage_from_fscache(fsc:%p/p:%p(i:%lx f:%lx)/0x%p)\n", nfs_i_fscache(inode), page, page->index, page-quoted
flags, inode);+ if (PageChecked(page)) { + ClearPageChecked(page) + return 1; + } + ret = fscache_read_or_alloc_page(nfs_i_fscache(inode), page, nfs_readpage_from_fscache_complete,
Yes, but how about just changing the above to: if (PageChecked(page)) return 1; SetPageChecked(page); Then you can short-circuit all further checks in __nfs_readpage_from_fscache() if they've already failed once. Note that I don't think it is useful to clear PageChecked() once it has been set. Once a call to nfs_readpage() succeeds, the page will need to be evicted from the page cache before we can call nfs_readpage() on it again. -- Trond Myklebust Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com