On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:40:20PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
We leak the memory allocated to 'ctxt' when we return after
'ib_dma_mapping_error()' returns !=0.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <redacted>
I don't know this code, but I can't see how that could be wrong....
Applying unless Tom tells me otherwise.
--b.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
svc_rdma_transport.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
compile tested only
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
index 9df1ead..1a10dcd 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
@@ -1335,6 +1335,7 @@ void svc_rdma_send_error(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt, struct rpcrdma_msg *rmsgp,
p, 0, length, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
if (ib_dma_mapping_error(xprt->sc_cm_id->device, ctxt->sge[0].addr)) {
put_page(p);
+ svc_rdma_put_context(ctxt, 1);
return;
}
atomic_inc(&xprt->sc_dma_used);
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.