Re: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2021-11-24 14:22:31
Also in:
linux-sh, lkml
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2021-11-24 14:22:31
Also in:
linux-sh, lkml
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:15 PM André Almeida [off-list ref] wrote:
Às 04:49 de 24/11/21, Arnd Bergmann escreveu:quoted
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:31 AM Rob Landley [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 11/23/21 5:38 AM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:@@ -451,3 +451,4 @@ 446 common landlock_restrict_self sys_landlock_restrict_self # 447 reserved for memfd_secret 448 common process_mrelease sys_process_mrelease +449 common futex_waitv sys_futex_waitvI don't know what's going on with this one, I don't actually see a reason why it isn't already wired up on all architectures. If we add this, it should probably be done for all architectures at once as a bugfix, but it's possible that this is intentionally only used on x86 and arm. André, can you comment on this?I've added entries for the archs that I've actually tested, but there should not be any arch-specific problems in futex_waitv. I'll submit a patch to wire it up for the remaining architectures.
Ok, thank you.
Arnd