Re: linux-next: build failure while building Linus' tree
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: 2021-09-10 22:17:29
Also in:
lkml, llvm
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 3:02 PM Nick Desaulniers [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 3:50 PM Nick Desaulniers [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+ Rasmus This was introduced in commit f0907827a8a91 ("compiler.h: enable builtin overflow checkers and add fallback code") which added division using the `/` operator, which is problematic when checking for overflows of 64b operands on 32b targets. We'll probably need helpers from linux/math64.h and some combination of __builtin_choose_expr/__builtin_types_compatible_p. That will help us fix another compiler bug for older clang releases, too. https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1438.Ok, I have something hacked up that I think will work: https://gist.github.com/nickdesaulniers/2479818f4983bbf2d688cebbab435863
hmm...playing around with adding some static asserts to the above, I
don't think it's quite right, specifically:
#define div_64(dividend, divisor) ({ \
typeof(dividend) z;
might declare z with the expected sign, but not necessarily the
correct width when the dividend is 32b but the divisor is 64b. Feels
a bit like trying to encode the C type promotion rules in a macro...
This incomplete diff is a little hacked up to reproduce the issue with a known-bad revision of clang that demonstrates a similar issue to GCC 4.9. You can ignore the movement of check_mul_overflow and friends in include/linux/overflow.h. I think I'm going to break that up into 2 or 3 patches: 1. move is_signed_type from include/linux/overflow.h to perhaps include/linux/typecheck.h. 2. add div64_x64, div_x64, and div_64 to include/linux/math64.h, use them in include/linux/overflow.h to fix GCC 4.9 3. move multiply fallbacks out of COMPILER_HAS_GENERIC_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW for clang < 14. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
-- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers