On 5/18/21 2:43 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:

On 5/17/2021 5:38 PM, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:

quoted

On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 11:34:49PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:

quoted

This should work I think:

compiled well with clang-10.0.1, clang-11.0.0,
and gcc-10.2.0 with x86_64 default config.

is the condition CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION > 110000,
not including 110000 it self?

Good spot.

Ah sorry, that should definitely be >= :(

That is what I get for writing an email that late... in reality, it probably
won't matter due to the availability of 11.0.1 and 11.1.0 but it should
absolutely be changed.

I have not given Nick's patch a go yet but would something like this be
acceptable?

Yes.

If so, did you want me to send a formal fixup patch or did you want
to send a v4? I have no personal preference.

At this point a fixup is the usual way. Andrew might squash it to the original
patch (also with Marco's fixup) before sending to Linus.

quoted

quoted

diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
index 9d316aac0aba..1b653266f2aa 100644
--- a/include/linux/slab.h
+++ b/include/linux/slab.h

@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int

__kmalloc_index(size_t size,
      if (size <=  16 * 1024 * 1024) return 24;
      if (size <=  32 * 1024 * 1024) return 25;
  -    if (size_is_constant)
+    if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || CONFIG_CLANG_VERSION > 110000) &&
size_is_constant)
          BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(1, "unexpected size in kmalloc_index()");
      else
          BUG();